P. F. Scheidelman & Sons, Inc. v. State Liquor Authority

New York Court of Appeals

P. F. Scheidelman & Sons, Inc. v. State Liquor Authority

263 N.E.2d 670, 27 N.Y.2d 778, 315 N.Y.S.2d 307, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1056

DecidedOctober 8, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 263 N.E.2d 670 (P. F. Scheidelman & Sons, Inc. v. State Liquor Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

P. F. Scheidelman & Sons, Inc. v. State Liquor Authority, 263 N.E.2d 670, 27 N.Y.2d 778, 315 N.Y.S.2d 307, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1056 (N.Y. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

[782]*782In the first, third, fourth, fifth and sixth above-entitled proceedings: Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

In the second above-entitled proceeding: Order modified by-reinstating determination of State Liquor Authority as to charge No. 1, upon the ground that there was substantial evidence to support charge, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[782]*782In the first, third, fourth, fifth and sixth above-entitled proceedings: Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

In the second above-entitled proceeding: Order modified by-reinstating determination of State Liquor Authority as to charge No. 1, upon the ground that there was substantial evidence to support charge, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 N.E.2d 670, 27 N.Y.2d 778, 315 N.Y.S.2d 307, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1056, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/p-f-scheidelman-sons-inc-v-state-liquor-authority-ny-1970.