P. F. Avery Corp. v. New Hampshire Commission for Human Rights

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

P. F. Avery Corp. v. New Hampshire Commission for Human Rights

453 A.2d 1254, 122 N.H. 954, 1982 N.H. LEXIS 498

Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided November 5, 1982·No. No. 82-038·Published

Opinion

Memorandum Opinion

This appeal raises an issue under RSA 354-A:4 as to the number of commissioners which satisfies the requirement of a quorum for decisions rendered by the New Hampshire Commission for Human Rights (commission). We hold that a quorum of the commission consists of three commissioners.

A hearing was held on November 21, 1980, upon a complaint brought by Reggie Brown charging racial discrimination by the P. F. Avery Corporation. Three commissioners sat and heard the evidence. Before the decision was rendered, one of the three commissioners resigned. The remaining two commissioners rendered a decision which was favorable to Brown and from which the Corporation appealed, arguing, inter alia, that a quorum had not existed. The appeal was heard before a Master (Mayland H. Morse, Jr., Esq.), whose decision was approved by Nadeau, J. The matter was remanded to the commission to be reviewed by “the entire commission based on the records ....”

The legislature has provided that “[t]hree members of the commission shall constitute a quorum for the purpose of conducting the business thereof.” RSA 354-A:4. The business of the commission includes the decision-making process as well as the hearing of complaints. Because this complaint was decided with less than the requisite number of commissioners, the decision is void. Accordingly, we reverse in part and remand the case to the trial court for an order that the complaint be heard again and decided by a quorum of not less than three commissioners.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum Opinion

This appeal raises an issue under RSA 354-A:4 as to the number of commissioners which satisfies the requirement of a quorum for decisions rendered by the New Hampshire Commission for Human Rights (commission). We hold that a quorum of the commission consists of three commissioners.

A hearing was held on November 21, 1980, upon a complaint brought by Reggie Brown charging racial discrimination by the P. F. Avery Corporation. Three commissioners sat and heard the evidence. Before the decision was rendered, one of the three commissioners resigned. The remaining two commissioners rendered a decision which was favorable to Brown and from which the Corporation appealed, arguing, inter alia, that a quorum had not existed. The appeal was heard before a Master (Mayland H. Morse, Jr., Esq.), whose decision was approved by Nadeau, J. The matter was remanded to the commission to be reviewed by “the entire commission based on the records ....”

The legislature has provided that “[t]hree members of the commission shall constitute a quorum for the purpose of conducting the business thereof.” RSA 354-A:4. The business of the commission includes the decision-making process as well as the hearing of complaints. Because this complaint was decided with less than the requisite number of commissioners, the decision is void. Accordingly, we reverse in part and remand the case to the trial court for an order that the complaint be heard again and decided by a quorum of not less than three commissioners.

Reversed and remanded.

P. F. Avery Corp. v. New Hampshire Commission for Human Rights, 453 A.2d 1254, 122 N.H. 954, 1982 N.H. LEXIS 498 (N.H. 1982).

Pincite

453 A.2d 1254 (P. F. Avery Corp. v. New Hampshire Commission for Human Rights) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.