<p data-block-key="7kkew">U.S. v. ASHFORD</p>
This text of <p data-block-key="7kkew">U.S. v. ASHFORD</p> (<p data-block-key="7kkew">U.S. v. ASHFORD</p>) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before KISOR, MIZER and HARRELL Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES Appellee
v.
Rahmiel S. ASHFORD Aviation Structural Mechanic Third Class (E-4), U.S. Navy Appellant
No. 202400254
Decided: 17 October 2024
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge: Michael F. Whitican
Sentence adjudged 9 May 2024 by a special court-martial tried at Naval Air Station Whidbey Island, Washington, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-3, con- finement for 45 days, and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant: Lieutenant Meggie C. Kane-Cruz, JAGC, USN United States v. Ashford, NMCCA No. 202400254 Opinion of the Court
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 1 However, we note that the Entry of Judgment inaccurately reflects the date of the offense in Specification 3 of the Additional Charge and fails to reflect that the terms of confinement are to run concurrently. Although we find no prejudice, Appellant is entitled to have court-martial records that correctly re- flect the content of his proceeding. 2 In accordance with Rule for Courts-Martial 1111(c)(2), we modify the Entry of Judgment and direct that it be included in the record. The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court
1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
2 United States v. Sutton, 81 M.J. 677 (N-M. Ct. Crim. App. 2021); United States v.
Crumpley, 49 M.J. 538, 539 (N-M. Ct. Crim. App. 1998).
2 UNITED STATES NMCCA NO. 202400254
v. ENTRY OF Rahmiel S. ASHFORD JUDGMENT Aviation Structural Mechanic Third Class Petty Officer (E-4) As Modified on Appeal U.S. Navy Accused 17 October 2024
On 9 May 2024, the Accused was tried at Naval Air Station Whidbey Island, Washington by special court-martial consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Military Judge Michael F. Whitican presided.
FINDINGS
The following are the Accused’s pleas and the Court’s finding to all offenses the convening authority referred to trial:
Charge: Violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 912a. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.
Specification 1: Wrongful introduction of some amount of cocaine onto an installation used by the armed forces or under the control of the armed forces on or about 23 February 2024. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty. United States v. Ashford, NMCCA No. 202400254 Modified Entry of Judgement
Specification 2: Wrongful introduction of some amount of marijuana onto an installation used by the armed forces or under the control of the armed forces on or about 23 February 2024. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.
Specification 3: Wrongful introduction of some amount of psilocybin mushrooms, a Schedule I controlled substance, onto an installation used by the armed forces or under the control of the armed forces on or about 23 February 2024. Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Withdrawn and dismissed without prejudice to ripen into prejudice upon completion of appellate review.
Specification 4: Wrongful use of cocaine on or about 23 February 2024. Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Withdrawn and dismissed without prejudice to ripen into prejudice upon completion of appellate review.
Specification 5: Wrongful use of marijuana on or about 23 February 2024. Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Withdrawn and dismissed without prejudice to ripen into prejudice upon completion of appellate review.
Additional Charge: Violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 912a. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.
Specification 1: Wrongful use of methamphetamine on or about 5 March 2024. Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Withdrawn and dismissed without prejudice to ripen into prejudice upon completion of appellate review.
2 United States v. Ashford, NMCCA No. 202400254 Modified Entry of Judgement
Specification 2: Wrongful use of cocaine on or about 5 March 2024. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.
Specification 3: Wrongful use of marijuana on or about 5 March 2024. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.
Second Additional Charge: Violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 912a. Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Withdrawn and dismissed without prejudice to ripen into prejudice upon completion of appellate review.
Specification: Wrongful introduction of some amount of methamphetamine onto an installation used by the armed forces or under the control of the armed forces on or about 23 February 2024. Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Withdrawn and dismissed without prejudice to ripen into prejudice upon completion of appellate review.
3 United States v. Ashford, NMCCA No. 202400254 Modified Entry of Judgement
SENTENCE
On 9 May 2024, the military judge sentenced the Accused to the following: Reduction to pay grade E-3. Confinement for a total of 45 days, as follows: For Specification 1 of the Charge: confinement for 35 days. For Specification 2 of the Charge: confinement for 35 days. For Specification 2 of the Additional Charge: confinement for 45 days. For Specification 3 of the Additional Charge: confinement for 45 days. The terms of confinement will run concurrently. A bad-conduct discharge.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
<p data-block-key="7kkew">U.S. v. ASHFORD</p>, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/p-data-block-key7kkewus-v-ashfordp-nmcca-2024.