<p data-block-key="72sqd">U.S. v. RIALE</p>
This text of <p data-block-key="72sqd">U.S. v. RIALE</p> (<p data-block-key="72sqd">U.S. v. RIALE</p>) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before DALY, McCOY, and GROSS Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES Appellee
v.
Allysa F. RIALE Boatswain’s Mate Seaman (E-3), U.S. Navy Appellant
No. 202400049
Decided: 29 August 2024
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge: Benjamin B. Garcia
Sentence adjudged 15 December 2023 by a special court-martial con- vened at Fleet Activities, Yokosuka, Japan, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, confinement for 90 days, 1 and a bad-conduct discharge. 2
1 Appellant received 138 days of confinement credit.
2 The military judge recommended suspending the bad-conduct discharge for 6
months. The convening authority denied the military judge’s recommendation. United States v. Riale, NMCCA No. 202400049 Opinion of the Court
For Appellant: Lieutenant Raymond E. Bilter, JAGC, USN
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 3 However, we note that the Entry of Judgment fails to state whether the confinement awarded for the charges shall run consecutively or concurrently as required by Rule for Courts-Martial (R.C.M.) 1111(b)(2)(B). 4 Although we find no prejudice, Appellant is entitled to have court-martial records that cor- rectly reflect the content of her proceeding. 5 In accordance with R.C.M. 1111(c)(2), we modify the Entry of Judgment and direct that it be included in the record. The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court
3 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
4 See United States v. Wadaa, __M.J.__, No. 202300273, 2024 CCA LEXIS 148 at
*6 (N-M. Ct. Crim. App. Apr. 25, 2024) (establishing minimum requirements for EOJs: 1) the Article of the UCMJ for each charge; 2) the applicable subsection, if any, for each specification; 3) the nature of the offense in the specification; and 4) the date of the offense). 5 United States v. Crumpley, 49 M.J. 538, 539 (N-M. Ct. Crim. App. 1998).
2 UNITED STATES NMCCA NO. 202400049
v. ENTRY OF Allysa F. RIALE JUDGMENT Boatswain’s Mate Seaman (E-3) U.S. Navy As Modified on Appeal Accused 29 August 2024 On 15 December 2023, the Accused was tried at Fleet Activities Yokosuka, Japan, by a special court-martial, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Military Judge Benjamin B. Garcia presided.
FINDINGS
The following are the Accused’s pleas and the Court’s findings to all of- fenses the convening authority referred to trial:
Charge I: Violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 912a. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.
Specification 1: Possession of Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD) onto a vessel used by the armed forces, on or about March 2023. Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Withdrawn and Dismissed.
Specification 2: Possession of Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD) on divers occasions between December 2022 and March 2023. Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Withdrawn and Dismissed.
Specification 3: Use of Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD) on divers occasions between December 2022 and March 2023. United States v. Riale, NMCCA No. 202400049 Modified Entry of Judgment
Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Withdrawn and Dismissed.
Specification 4: Distribution of Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD) on divers occasions between December 2022 and March 2023. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.
Charge II: Violation of Article 81, Uniform Code of Military Justice 10 U.S.C. § 881. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.
Specification: Conspiracy to distribute Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD) between December 2022 and March 2023. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.
SENTENCE
On 15 December 2023, the military judge sentenced the Accused to the fol- lowing: Reduction to pay grade E-1. For Specification 4 of Charge I: confinement for 80 days. For the sole Specification of Charge II: confinement for 90 days. The terms of confinement will run concurrently. Confinement for a total of 90 days with 138 days confinement credit. A bad-conduct discharge.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
<p data-block-key="72sqd">U.S. v. RIALE</p>, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/p-data-block-key72sqdus-v-rialep-nmcca-2024.