<p data-block-key="35fnr">U.S. v. SIMMONS</p>
This text of <p data-block-key="35fnr">U.S. v. SIMMONS</p> (<p data-block-key="35fnr">U.S. v. SIMMONS</p>) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before DALY, GROSS, and de GROOT Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES Appellee
v.
Chad M. SIMMONS Master-at-Arms Chief Petty Officer (E-7), U.S. Navy Appellant
No. 202400127
Decided: 3 October 2024
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge: Philip J. Hamon
Sentence adjudged 30 January 2024 by a special court-martial tried at Naval Station San Diego, California, consisting of a military judge sit- ting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-5, con- finement for 45 days, and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant: Lieutenant Andrew C. Sand, JAGC, USN United States v. Simmons, NMCCA No. 202400127 Opinion of the Court
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 1 The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court
1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
<p data-block-key="35fnr">U.S. v. SIMMONS</p>, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/p-data-block-key35fnrus-v-simmonsp-nmcca-2024.