P. D. C. Building Corp. v. Dekdebrun

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

P. D. C. Building Corp. v. Dekdebrun

40 A.D.2d 626, 336 N.Y.S.2d 892, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3851

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 27, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 40 A.D.2d 626 (P. D. C. Building Corp. v. Dekdebrun) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

P. D. C. Building Corp. v. Dekdebrun, 40 A.D.2d 626, 336 N.Y.S.2d 892, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Appellants.—Judgment unanimously, affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The reclassification of petitioner’s property from B-3 to R-5 was discriminatory and not in accordance with a comprehensive plan as required by section 263 of the Town Law. (See Udell v. Haas, 21 N Y 2d 463.) (Appeal from judgment of Erie Special Term in article 78 proceeding to annul zoning determination.) Present — Goldman, P. J., Del Vecchio, Moule and Cardamone, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appellants.—Judgment unanimously, affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The reclassification of petitioner’s property from B-3 to R-5 was discriminatory and not in accordance with a comprehensive plan as required by section 263 of the Town Law. (See Udell v. Haas, 21 N Y 2d 463.) (Appeal from judgment of Erie Special Term in article 78 proceeding to annul zoning determination.) Present — Goldman, P. J., Del Vecchio, Moule and Cardamone, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A.D.2d 626, 336 N.Y.S.2d 892, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/p-d-c-building-corp-v-dekdebrun-nyappdiv-1972.