P. C. & S. L. Railway Co. v. Hedges

41 Ohio St. (N.S.) 233
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1884·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

The petition asked damages for horses killed by defendant’s train, and counted upon two distinct wrongful acts as causes of the killing; first, neglect to keep in repair a fence as required by contract; and second, negligence in running the train. A motion to require plaintiff to elect whether he would rely upon the breach of contract, or the tort, was overruled.

Meld: The doctrine of election applies where one wrongful act is charged, and the plaintiff is entitled to treat it as having either of two natures. But the addition of a tort to a separate and distinct act in violation of contract, does [234]*234to a separate and distinct act in violation of contract, does not deprive the injured party of the right to complain at the same time, of both wrongs. Of course he cannot recover double damages.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

P. C. & S. L. Railway Co. v. Hedges, 41 Ohio St. (N.S.) 233 (Ohio 1884).

41 Ohio St. (N.S.) 233 (P. C. & S. L. Railway Co. v. Hedges) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.