P & C Food Markets, Inc. v. Grant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

P & C Food Markets, Inc. v. Grant

12 A.D.2d 881, 210 N.Y.S.2d 16, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13525

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 5, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 881 (P & C Food Markets, Inc. v. Grant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

P & C Food Markets, Inc. v. Grant, 12 A.D.2d 881, 210 N.Y.S.2d 16, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13525 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously modified by striking therefrom the first and second ordering paragraphs thereof and by modifying the third ordering paragraph thereof to read as follows: “ Ordered that, with respect to the application of the petitioner for a permit to distribute milk and milk products in said City of Oswego, obtained from the processing plants of Dairymen’s League Co-operative Association, Inc. and Byrne Dairy, Inc., both located at Syracuse, N. Y., the matter be, and the same hereby is remitted to the respondent for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum of this Court,” and as so modified the order is affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements to appellant. Memorandum: There must be affirmative action taken by local health officers who receive applications for local milk permits, in order to comply with section 258-j of the Agriculture and Markets Law. This section plays an important part in the plan of control and distribution of milk products within the State of New York. Its mandates should not be disregarded or eliminated by judicial interpretation. In order to fully [882]*882comply with the section, health officers must forward to the Commissioner information tending either to satisfy him in regard to the three subjects involved or on the other hand, to indicate that the facts gathered are not such as would warrant his satisfaction. In either event the health officer must forward the information contemplated by the section to the Commissioner. The local health officer should have a reasonable time within which to assemble and forward the information, and upon receipt of the Commissioner’s indication of satisfaction or nonsatisfaction as to the three subjects, either grant or deny the application, providing of course that health and sanitation requirements are met. (Appeal from order of Oswego Special Term annulling the action of the Health Officer of Oswego, directing that a permit be issued to petitioner to distribute milk and milk products in Oswego obtained from the plant of Byrne Dairy, Inc., and remitting the application of petitioner for a permit to distribute milk, etc., obtained from the Dairymen’s League Co-op. Assn, for further proceedings.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously modified by striking therefrom the first and second ordering paragraphs thereof and by modifying the third ordering paragraph thereof to read as follows: “ Ordered that, with respect to the application of the petitioner for a permit to distribute milk and milk products in said City of Oswego, obtained from the processing plants of Dairymen’s League Co-operative Association, Inc. and Byrne Dairy, Inc., both located at Syracuse, N. Y., the matter be, and the same hereby is remitted to the respondent for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum of this Court,” and as so modified the order is affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements to appellant. Memorandum: There must be affirmative action taken by local health officers who receive applications for local milk permits, in order to comply with section 258-j of the Agriculture and Markets Law. This section plays an important part in the plan of control and distribution of milk products within the State of New York. Its mandates should not be disregarded or eliminated by judicial interpretation. In order to fully [882]*882comply with the section, health officers must forward to the Commissioner information tending either to satisfy him in regard to the three subjects involved or on the other hand, to indicate that the facts gathered are not such as would warrant his satisfaction. In either event the health officer must forward the information contemplated by the section to the Commissioner. The local health officer should have a reasonable time within which to assemble and forward the information, and upon receipt of the Commissioner’s indication of satisfaction or nonsatisfaction as to the three subjects, either grant or deny the application, providing of course that health and sanitation requirements are met. (Appeal from order of Oswego Special Term annulling the action of the Health Officer of Oswego, directing that a permit be issued to petitioner to distribute milk and milk products in Oswego obtained from the plant of Byrne Dairy, Inc., and remitting the application of petitioner for a permit to distribute milk, etc., obtained from the Dairymen’s League Co-op. Assn, for further proceedings.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 881, 210 N.Y.S.2d 16, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/p-c-food-markets-inc-v-grant-nyappdiv-1961.