P., C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Bemis

1 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 112
CourtOhio Superior Court, Cincinnati
DecidedApril 25, 1903
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 112 (P., C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Bemis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
P., C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Bemis, 1 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 112 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1903).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

As to the various grounds of error alleged herein other than those disposed of in the written opinion heretofore handed down, this court, at request of counsel, says that' the court has examined them all with care, and in its judgment none of them are well taken. As to the claim of plaintiff in error that the court instructed the jury on the question of injury to plaintiff’s business when there was no evidence in the ease of such injury, that claim resolves itself into an instruction on an abstract proposition of law not in the case, and hence not prejudicial to defendant below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/p-c-c-st-l-ry-co-v-bemis-ohsuperctcinci-1903.