P. C. Beck Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

P. C. Beck Co. v. United States

28 Cust. Ct. 385, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 183

United States Customs Court·Decided February 5, 1952·No. No. 56343; protest 153874-K (Norfolk)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

La1whence, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of ferrous or nonferrous materials of which ferrous or nonferrous metal is the component material of chief value, which are secondhand or waste or refuse, or are obsolete, defective, or damaged, and which are fit only to be remanufac-tured. Upon the agreed statement of facts, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, supra, and is properly entitled to free entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

La1whence, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of ferrous or nonferrous materials of which ferrous or nonferrous metal is the component material of chief value, which are secondhand or waste or refuse, or are obsolete, defective, or damaged, and which are fit only to be remanufac-tured. Upon the agreed statement of facts, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, supra, and is properly entitled to free entry.

P. C. Beck Co. v. United States, 28 Cust. Ct. 385, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 183 (cusc 1952).

Pincite

28 Cust. Ct. 385 (P. C. Beck Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.