Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Ozogar v. Pierce, Butler & Pierce Manufacturing Co.

Ozogar v. Pierce, Butler & Pierce Manufacturing Co.

152 A.D. 901
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ozogar v. Pierce, Butler & Pierce Manufacturing Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 134 A.D. 800 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 15, 1912·Published

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the plaintiff ' failed to establish actionable negligence on the part of the defendant. See same case on former appeal, 134 AppeHate Division, 800. AH concurred, except Spring and Kruse, JJ., who dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ozogar v. Pierce, Butler & Pierce Manufacturing Co., 152 A.D. 901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

152 A.D. 901 (Ozogar v. Pierce, Butler & Pierce Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.