Ozier v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ozier v. State

261 S.W.3d 621, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 827, 2008 WL 2421092

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 17, 2008

DocketED 90485

StatusPublished

This text of 261 S.W.3d 621 (Ozier v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ozier v. State, 261 S.W.3d 621, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 827, 2008 WL 2421092 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kareem Ozier (“movant”) appeals the judgment of the trial court denying his petition to reopen his original motion under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15. Movant argues he was abandoned by post-conviction counsel because of a conflict of interest.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI