Ozenne v. Chase Manhattan Bank
828 F.3d 1012, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 12883
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 13, 2016·No. No. 11-60039; BAP No. 11-1208·Published
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en bane pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ozenne v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 828 F.3d 1012, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 12883 (9th Cir. 2016).
828 F.3d 1012 (Ozenne v. Chase Manhattan Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.