Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Oyola v. State

Oyola v. State

982 So. 2d 1202, 2008 WL 2116909
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 21, 2008
Docket4D07-3495
StatusPublished

This text of 982 So. 2d 1202 (Oyola v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oyola v. State, 982 So. 2d 1202, 2008 WL 2116909 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

982 So.2d 1202 (2008)

Pablo OYOLA, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D07-3495.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 21, 2008.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tom Wm. Odom, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Diane F. Medley, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice for appellant to re-file his motion for mitigation of sentence within sixty days of the issuance of the mandate in this case. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(c).

STEVENSON, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
982 So. 2d 1202, 2008 WL 2116909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oyola-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.