Oyola v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Oyola v. State

600 So. 2d 1273, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7187, 1992 WL 135052

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 19, 1992

DocketNo. 91-02822

StatusPublished

This text of 600 So. 2d 1273 (Oyola v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oyola v. State, 600 So. 2d 1273, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7187, 1992 WL 135052 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s judgments and sentences. The appellant contends, and the appellee agrees, that the trial court erred in imposing restitution without allowing the appellant to present evidence concerning his ability to pay. Pope v. State, 575 So.2d 307 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). Accordingly, we reverse the restitution order and remand for another restitution hearing.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and HALL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s judgments and sentences. The appellant contends, and the appellee agrees, that the trial court erred in imposing restitution without allowing the appellant to present evidence concerning his ability to pay. Pope v. State, 575 So.2d 307 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). Accordingly, we reverse the restitution order and remand for another restitution hearing.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and HALL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

600 So. 2d 1273, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7187, 1992 WL 135052, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oyola-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack