Oyler v. Clements

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Oyler v. Clements

107 A. 326, 264 Pa. 65, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 594

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 24, 1919

DocketAppeal, No. 6

StatusPublished

This text of 107 A. 326 (Oyler v. Clements) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oyler v. Clements, 107 A. 326, 264 Pa. 65, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 594 (Pa. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Tbe learned court below correctly held that the deed from the executor of the will of appellee’s father, executed and delivered to her in pursuance of its seventh clause, passed an absolute estate to her in the property she has contracted to sell to the appellant. Nothing is to be found in the six preceding clauses indicating a contrary intention by the testator, and, in the eighth and last, he places no restraint upon her power to dispose of what he gave her, in the preceding clause.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

Tbe learned court below correctly held that the deed from the executor of the will of appellee’s father, executed and delivered to her in pursuance of its seventh clause, passed an absolute estate to her in the property she has contracted to sell to the appellant. Nothing is to be found in the six preceding clauses indicating a contrary intention by the testator, and, in the eighth and last, he places no restraint upon her power to dispose of what he gave her, in the preceding clause.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 A. 326, 264 Pa. 65, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oyler-v-clements-pa-1919.