Oxnard v. Blake

45 Me. 602
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 1, 1858
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 45 Me. 602 (Oxnard v. Blake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oxnard v. Blake, 45 Me. 602 (Me. 1858).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was drawn up by

Hathaway, J.

Roxana Jordan mortgaged the replevied merchandize to the plaintiff, by his request, to secure her debt to him, and he took possession of it under the mortgage, which was duly recorded.

Although Mrs. Jordan also made a mortgage of the same merchandize to the defendant, and had it recorded at the same time with the mortgage and record thereof to the plaintiff, yet the defendant had no knowledge of it till after the mortgage to the plaintiff had been made, as he requested, and recorded and “approved” by him, which was equivalent to an actual delivery of the mortgage by the mortgager to the plaintiff. Hedge v. Drew, 12 Pick. 141. A deed takes effect from its delivery, and Mrs. Jordan had no legal right to take the plaintiff’s mortgage from the registry, after it had been approved and assented to by him, for it was his property.

The case finds no privity between the plaintiff and the defendant, nor any authority in the plaintiff to assent to the [606]*606mortgage of Mrs. Jordan to the defendant, nor any knowledge of the plaintiff that the defendant would assent to it.

The mere making of the mortgage by Mrs. Jordan to the defendant, and causing it to be recorded without his assent or knowledge, did not amount to a delivery of it to him, so as to enable him, by his subsequent assent to it, to defeat or impair the title to the merchandize which had been previously acquired by the plaintiff. Maynard v. Maynard, 10 Mass. 456; Harrison v. Phillips Academy, 12 Mass. 461; Dole v. Bodman, 3 Met. 139, cited in argument.

Defendant defaulted. .

Tenney, C. J., Rice, Appleton, Cutting, and Goodenow, J. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Breathwit v. Bank of Fordyce
28 S.W. 511 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1894)
Springate ex rel. Nelson Distilling Co. v. Koppelman Furniture Co.
51 Mo. App. 1 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1892)
Hart v. Forbes
60 Miss. 745 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1883)
Wheeler v. Emerson
44 N.H. 182 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1860)
Derry Bank v. Webster
44 N.H. 264 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1860)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 Me. 602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oxnard-v-blake-me-1858.