Oxley v. Sattler
This text of 739 So. 2d 183 (Oxley v. Sattler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Kenneth OXLEY
v.
Stanley SATTLER, et al.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Joseph J. Bailey, James Michael Chamblee, Albin Alexandre Provosty, Provosty, Sadler & Delaunay, Alexandria, for Applicant.
William Preston Crews, Jr., Watson, Murchison, Crews, Arthur & Corkern, Natchitoches, for Respondent.
Prior report: 710 So.2d 261.
PER CURIAM.[*]
Upon defendants' application, we granted certiorari in this case. 98-1864 (La.11/20/98), 728 So.2d 878. After hearing oral arguments and reviewing the record in this case, we conclude that the judgment below does not require the exercise of our supervisory authority. Accordingly, we recall our order of November 20, 1998 as improvidently granted, and deny defendants' application.
TRAYLOR, J., dissents.
NOTES
[*] Victory, J. not on panel. Rule IV, Part II, § 3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
739 So. 2d 183, 1999 WL 236295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oxley-v-sattler-la-1999.