Oxley v. Oxley
43 A. 340, 191 Pa. 474, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 843
Opinion
An examination of the record in this case has satisfied us that the learned judge’s findings of fact, upon which the decree is based were fully warranted by the evidence duly taken and reported by the learned commissioner appointed for that purpose. There appears to be no ground on which the validity of said decree can be successfully assailed.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oxley v. Oxley, 43 A. 340, 191 Pa. 474, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 843 (Pa. 1899).
43 A. 340 (Oxley v. Oxley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Garlesky v. Garlesky
20 Pa. D. & C.3d 232 (Somerset County Court of Common Pleas, 1981)
Bonomo v. Bonomo
187 A. 222 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Bonomo v. Bonomo
24 Pa. D. & C. 88 (Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas, 1935)
Smith v. Smith
16 Pa. D. & C. 414 (Schuylkill County Court of Common Pleas, 1931)
Seebold v. Seebold
10 Pa. D. & C. 385 (Snyder County Court of Common Pleas, 1927)
Huston v. Huston
7 Pa. D. & C. 679 (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 1926)
Poteet v. Poteet
6 Pa. D. & C. 422 (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 1925)
Lynn v. Lynn
76 Pa. Super. 428 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)
Smith v. Smith
72 Pa. Super. 96 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)
Cantor v. Cantor
70 Pa. Super. 108 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1918)
Ehrhardt v. Ehrhardt
54 Pa. Super. 166 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1913)
Sonricker v. Sonricker
39 Pa. Super. 652 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1909)
Johnson v. Johnson
31 Pa. Super. 53 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1906)
Krug v. Krug
22 Pa. Super. 572 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1903)
Baker v. Baker
46 A. 96 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1900)