Oxley v. Matillo

Indiana Supreme Court

Oxley v. Matillo

762 N.E.2d 1243, 2002 WL 258117

Indiana Supreme Court·Decided February 22, 2002·No. 32S05-0202-CV-124·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Appellee, Vicki S. Matillo, by counsel, files an "Appellee's Petition to Transfer." *1244 The opinion of the is found at Oxley v. Matillo, 747 N.E.2d 1179 (Ind.Ct.App.2001).

In light of this Court's decision in Ray-Hayes v. Heinamann, 760 N.E.2d 172 (Ind.2002), this Court GRANTS the Petition to Transfer, thereby vacating the opinion of the Court of Appeals, see Appellate Rule 58(A), and AFFIRMS the trial court's dismissal of this action.

All Justices concur, except for DICKSON, J., who dissents without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Appellee, Vicki S. Matillo, by counsel, files an "Appellee's Petition to Transfer." *1244 The opinion of the is found at Oxley v. Matillo, 747 N.E.2d 1179 (Ind.Ct.App.2001).

In light of this Court's decision in Ray-Hayes v. Heinamann, 760 N.E.2d 172 (Ind.2002), this Court GRANTS the Petition to Transfer, thereby vacating the opinion of the Court of Appeals, see Appellate Rule 58(A), and AFFIRMS the trial court's dismissal of this action.

All Justices concur, except for DICKSON, J., who dissents without opinion.

Oxley v. Matillo, 762 N.E.2d 1243, 2002 WL 258117 (Ind. 2002).

Pincite

762 N.E.2d 1243 (Oxley v. Matillo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related