Oxley v. Kilpatrick
510 S.E.2d 99, 235 Ga. App. 774, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 192, 1998 Ga. App. LEXIS 1547
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Oxley v. Kilpatrick. Read the opinion of the Court — 225 Ga. App. 838 →
Opinions
In Oxley v. Kilpatrick, 225 Ga. App. 838 (486 SE2d 44) (1997), we reversed the trial court’s grant of motions for summary judgment filed by Dr. Rossi and his two co-defendants. The Supreme Court granted certiorari and reversed our holding that Dr. Rossi was not entitled to summary judgment. Rossi v. Oxley, 269 Ga. 82 (495 SE2d 39) (1998). Accordingly, our judgment in this case is vacated as to Dr. Rossi, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court.
Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oxley v. Kilpatrick, 510 S.E.2d 99, 235 Ga. App. 774, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 192, 1998 Ga. App. LEXIS 1547 (Ga. Ct. App. 1998).
510 S.E.2d 99 (Oxley v. Kilpatrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lau's Corp., Inc. v. Haskins
405 S.E.2d 474 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1991)
General Motors Corp. v. Conkle
486 S.E.2d 180 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
Oxley v. Kilpatrick
486 S.E.2d 44 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
Rossi v. Oxley
495 S.E.2d 39 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1998)