Oxford v. Pierson
This text of 235 S.E.2d 572 (Oxford v. Pierson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mariam K. Oxford and others brought an action against Roberta S. Pierson alleging that Pierson was encroaching upon the lands of Oxford et al. and had torn down a fence on the dividing line between them, damaging them $500. Pierson denied this and claimed encroachment on her land. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Pierson. This is an appeal from the court’s overruling of plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial after jury verdict for defendant. We affirm.
In this land line dispute the jury found the true boundary to be as Pierson claimed. Since there is evidence in support of this verdict, there is no ground for reversal. "If there is any evidence to sustain the verdict of a jury, this court will not disturb it.” Worn v. Sea-Cold Services, 135 Ga. App. 256 (217 SE2d 425).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 S.E.2d 572, 142 Ga. App. 289, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oxford-v-pierson-gactapp-1977.