Oxford Health Plans, Inc. v. Deli & Caterers, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Oxford Health Plans, Inc. v. Deli & Caterers, Inc.

282 A.D.2d 728, 724 N.Y.S.2d 338, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4306

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 30, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 282 A.D.2d 728 (Oxford Health Plans, Inc. v. Deli & Caterers, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oxford Health Plans, Inc. v. Deli & Caterers, Inc., 282 A.D.2d 728, 724 N.Y.S.2d 338, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4306 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Phelan, J.), dated June 14, 2000, which granted the separate motions of the defendants Augustino Deli and Caterers, Inc., Antonio DiFonzo, Augustino DiFonzo, and Central Delicatessen and the defendant Newman Realty Co. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Based upon this Court’s decision and order in Humbach v Goldstein (229 AD2d 64), the Supreme Court properly awarded the defendants summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs subrogation action seeking to recover from the defendants, the alleged tortfeasors, medical insurance benefits paid to its injured subrogor. Krausman, J. P., Friedmann, Feuerstein and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Phelan, J.), dated June 14, 2000, which granted the separate motions of the defendants Augustino Deli and Caterers, Inc., Antonio DiFonzo, Augustino DiFonzo, and Central Delicatessen and the defendant Newman Realty Co. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Based upon this Court’s decision and order in Humbach v Goldstein (229 AD2d 64), the Supreme Court properly awarded the defendants summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs subrogation action seeking to recover from the defendants, the alleged tortfeasors, medical insurance benefits paid to its injured subrogor. Krausman, J. P., Friedmann, Feuerstein and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D.2d 728, 724 N.Y.S.2d 338, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oxford-health-plans-inc-v-deli-caterers-inc-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack