Oxford Consumer Discount Co. v. Adler

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Oxford Consumer Discount Co. v. Adler

296 So. 2d 568, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 6991

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 18, 1974

DocketNo. 73-1413

StatusPublished

This text of 296 So. 2d 568 (Oxford Consumer Discount Co. v. Adler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oxford Consumer Discount Co. v. Adler, 296 So. 2d 568, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 6991 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion made pursuant to Rule 1.540(b), RCP 31 F.S.A., to vacate a judgment. The issue here is whether the trial court erred in holding that appellant’s motion did not show excusable neglect. We hold that the motion and accompanying affidavit were insufficient to show excusable neglect. See Austin Burke, Inc. v. Vigilant Insurance Co., Fla.App.1965, 179 So.2d 600.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion made pursuant to Rule 1.540(b), RCP 31 F.S.A., to vacate a judgment. The issue here is whether the trial court erred in holding that appellant’s motion did not show excusable neglect. We hold that the motion and accompanying affidavit were insufficient to show excusable neglect. See Austin Burke, Inc. v. Vigilant Insurance Co., Fla.App.1965, 179 So.2d 600.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

296 So. 2d 568, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 6991, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oxford-consumer-discount-co-v-adler-fladistctapp-1974.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack