Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Oxenberg v. Oxenberg

Oxenberg v. Oxenberg

937 So. 2d 166, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 11924, 2006 WL 2001131
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 19, 2006
DocketNo. 3D06-1294
StatusPublished

This text of 937 So. 2d 166 (Oxenberg v. Oxenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oxenberg v. Oxenberg, 937 So. 2d 166, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 11924, 2006 WL 2001131 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s entry of an injunction dated April 27, 2006. The injunction was entered pursuant to Section 61.11, Florida Statutes (2005). We affirm on the authority of Sandstrom v. Scmdstrom, 565 So.2d 914 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), Kennedy v. Kennedy, 464 So.2d 1289 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), and Gilbert v. Gilbert, 447 So.2d 299 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). This affirmance is effective immediately and its effectiveness will not be delayed by the filing of a motion for rehearing or any other post-decision motion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kennedy v. Kennedy
464 So. 2d 1289 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Gilbert v. Gilbert
447 So. 2d 299 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Sandstrom v. Sandstrom
565 So. 2d 914 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
937 So. 2d 166, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 11924, 2006 WL 2001131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oxenberg-v-oxenberg-fladistctapp-2006.