Oxenberg v. Oxenberg
937 So. 2d 166, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 11924, 2006 WL 2001131
Opinion
This is an appeal from the trial court’s entry of an injunction dated April 27, 2006. The injunction was entered pursuant to Section 61.11, Florida Statutes (2005). We affirm on the authority of Sandstrom v. Scmdstrom, 565 So.2d 914 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), Kennedy v. Kennedy, 464 So.2d 1289 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), and Gilbert v. Gilbert, 447 So.2d 299 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). This affirmance is effective immediately and its effectiveness will not be delayed by the filing of a motion for rehearing or any other post-decision motion.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oxenberg v. Oxenberg, 937 So. 2d 166, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 11924, 2006 WL 2001131 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
937 So. 2d 166 (Oxenberg v. Oxenberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kennedy v. Kennedy
464 So. 2d 1289 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Gilbert v. Gilbert
447 So. 2d 299 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Sandstrom v. Sandstrom
565 So. 2d 914 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)