Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
OXBOW CARBON & MINERALS LLC, et al., )
)
Plaintiffs, )
)
� ) Civil Action No. 11-1049 (PLF)
)
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., et al., )
)
Defendants. )
ORDER
In anticipation of the above-captioned matter soon being transferred by consent to
Judge Beryl Howell, it is hereby
ORDERED that Defendants BNSF Railway Company and Union Pacific Railroad
Company's Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. No. 231] is denied without prejudice to its
being refiled before Judge Howell.
SO ORDERED.
e
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN
;1�.i-
DATE: "31 �I,, \ � "( United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.