Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
This text of Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
OXBOW CARBON & MINERALS LLC, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) � ) Civil Action No. 11-1049 (PLF) ) UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., et al., ) ) Defendants. )
ORDER
In anticipation of the above-captioned matter soon being transferred by consent to
Judge Beryl Howell, it is hereby
ORDERED that Defendants BNSF Railway Company and Union Pacific Railroad
Company's Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. No. 231] is denied without prejudice to its
being refiled before Judge Howell.
SO ORDERED.
e PAUL L. FRIEDMAN ;1�.i- DATE: "31 �I,, \ � "( United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oxbow-carbon-minerals-llc-v-union-pacific-railroad-company-dcd-2024.