Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided March 26, 2024·No. Civil Action No. 2011-1049·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

OXBOW CARBON & MINERALS LLC, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

� ) Civil Action No. 11-1049 (PLF)

)

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

In anticipation of the above-captioned matter soon being transferred by consent to

Judge Beryl Howell, it is hereby

ORDERED that Defendants BNSF Railway Company and Union Pacific Railroad

Company's Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. No. 231] is denied without prejudice to its

being refiled before Judge Howell.

SO ORDERED.

e

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

;1�.i-

DATE: "31 �I,, \ � "( United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, (D.D.C. 2024).

Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.