Owsley v. State

18 S.W.2d 178, 112 Tex. Crim. 641, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 498
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 17, 1929
DocketNo. 12428.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 18 S.W.2d 178 (Owsley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Owsley v. State, 18 S.W.2d 178, 112 Tex. Crim. 641, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 498 (Tex. 1929).

Opinions

LATTIMORE, Judge.

— Conviction for vagrancy; punishment, a fine of $150.00.

The State’s Attorney with this court moves to dismiss this appeal because there appears in the record no final judgment such as is *642 necessary to give this court jurisdiction of the appeal. Upon examination we are convinced of the soundness of the motion. Without judgment entered upon the verdict this court is without power to assume jurisdiction.

' The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sheffield v. State
57 S.W.2d 577 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 S.W.2d 178, 112 Tex. Crim. 641, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owsley-v-state-texcrimapp-1929.