Owsley v. Case

16 Wis. 606
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1863
StatusPublished

This text of 16 Wis. 606 (Owsley v. Case) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Owsley v. Case, 16 Wis. 606 (Wis. 1863).

Opinion

[607]*607 By the Court,

Dixon, C. J.

Appeal by ‘plaintiffs from a judgment of involuntary non-suit, and for costs against the plaintiffs in favor of the defendant Jackson Case, the husband of the defendant Betsey K. The action was in the nature of a bill quia timet, by the plaintiffs as owners in possession of certain real estate, to procure the cancellation of a tax deed of the same land to the defendant Mrs. Case, and which she claimed as her separate property. The question whether the husband is a necessary party in such case, was before us in Oatman vs. Goodrich, 15 Wis., 589, and we decided that he was.

The judgment must therefore be reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings according to law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oatman v. Goodrich
15 Wis. 589 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1862)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Wis. 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owsley-v-case-wis-1863.