Owner's Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Ott
431 So. 2d 695, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20778
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Owner's Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Ott. Read the opinion of the Court — 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20646 →
Opinion
Where a plaintiff, in an action for libel, failed to show that the defendant’s libelous letter had been received or read by any other person, there was no proof of publication, a necessary predicate to a finding of defamation, and the court should have directed a verdict for the defendant. See Owner's Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Ott, 402 So.2d 466 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).
Reversed and remanded with instructions to enter judgment for defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Owner's Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Ott, 431 So. 2d 695, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20778 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).
431 So. 2d 695 (Owner's Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Ott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Owner's Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Ott
402 So. 2d 466 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)