Owl Homes of Fredonia Inc. v. Gypsum Mills Estates

166 A.D.2d 895, 561 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12142

This text of 166 A.D.2d 895 (Owl Homes of Fredonia Inc. v. Gypsum Mills Estates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Owl Homes of Fredonia Inc. v. Gypsum Mills Estates, 166 A.D.2d 895, 561 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12142 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiffs motion for an order of attachment pursuant to CPLR 6201 (3). Plaintiff failed to prove defendant’s intent to frustrate the enforcement of a judgment (see, Loco X-Ray Sys. v Fingerhut, 88 AD2d 425, lv dismissed 58 NY2d 606; see also, Computer Strategies v Commodore Business Machs., 105 AD2d 167, rearg and lv denied 110 AD2d 743). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Curran, J.—attachment.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Laco X-Ray Systems, Inc. v. Fingerhut
88 A.D.2d 425 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Computer Strategies, Inc. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc.
105 A.D.2d 167 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 A.D.2d 895, 561 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owl-homes-of-fredonia-inc-v-gypsum-mills-estates-nyappdiv-1990.