Owl Cigar Co. v. Lidgerwood

27 N.Y.S. 932, 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 648
City of New York Municipal Court·Decided March 9, 1894·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

NEWBUBGEB, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion made by defendant to vacate a warrant of attachment. The attachment was granted on the ground that the defendant, “being an adult, and a resident of the city of New York, keeps himself concealed therein with the intent to avoid service of the summons, and that, after proper and diligent effort to ascertain the place of sojourn of the defendant, same cannot be ascertained.” It is conceded that the defendant knew he was insolvent, and that he was not to be found, either at his store or at his home. The [933] affidavit on which the attachment was granted made out a prima facie case, and the affidavits on the part of the defendant do not show such a state of affairs as would warrant us in vacating the attachment. The order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Owl Cigar Co. v. Lidgerwood, 27 N.Y.S. 932, 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 648 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

27 N.Y.S. 932 (Owl Cigar Co. v. Lidgerwood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Owl Cigar Co. v. Lidgerwood
32 N.Y.S. 1148 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1895)