Owings v. Wyant

General Court of Virginia

Owings v. Wyant

3 Md. 393

General Court of Virginia·Decided October 15, 1795·Published

Opinion

The Court

(S. Chase, Ch. J. and J. T. Chase, J.)

overruled the objection, and determined that parol evidence might be given to prove that the defendant was an innkeeper.

The defendant excepted to this opinion, and appealed to the court of appeals, where the appeal was dismissed by the appellant’s counsel. A writ of error was after-wards brought, and the judgment of the general court was affirmed at June term, 1797.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court

(S. Chase, Ch. J. and J. T. Chase, J.)

overruled the objection, and determined that parol evidence might be given to prove that the defendant was an innkeeper.

The defendant excepted to this opinion, and appealed to the court of appeals, where the appeal was dismissed by the appellant’s counsel. A writ of error was after-wards brought, and the judgment of the general court was affirmed at June term, 1797.

Owings v. Wyant, 3 Md. 393 (Va. Super. Ct. 1795).

Pincite

3 Md. 393 (Owings v. Wyant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.