Owings v. Wyant

General Court of Virginia

Owings v. Wyant

3 Md. 393

DecidedOctober 15, 1795

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Md. 393 (Owings v. Wyant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering General Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Owings v. Wyant, 3 Md. 393 (Va. Super. Ct. 1795).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court

(S. Chase, Ch. J. and J. T. Chase, J.)

overruled the objection, and determined that parol evidence might be given to prove that the defendant was an innkeeper.

The defendant excepted to this opinion, and appealed to the court of appeals, where the appeal was dismissed by the appellant’s counsel. A writ of error was after-wards brought, and the judgment of the general court was affirmed at June term, 1797.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court

(S. Chase, Ch. J. and J. T. Chase, J.)

overruled the objection, and determined that parol evidence might be given to prove that the defendant was an innkeeper.

The defendant excepted to this opinion, and appealed to the court of appeals, where the appeal was dismissed by the appellant’s counsel. A writ of error was after-wards brought, and the judgment of the general court was affirmed at June term, 1797.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Md. 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owings-v-wyant-vagensess-1795.