Owes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Owes v. State

790 So. 2d 1287, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11471, 2001 WL 914018

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 15, 2001

DocketNo. 4D99-3498

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 790 So. 2d 1287 (Owes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Owes v. State, 790 So. 2d 1287, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11471, 2001 WL 914018 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Raymond Owes, the appellant, was convicted of trespass of an occupied structure and aggravated battery, receiving a sentence of eighty-six days incarceration for the trespass charge and fifteen years as both an habitual felony offender and a prison releasee reoffender for the aggravated battery, Owes challenges both his convictions and the aggravated battery sentence. While we affirm Owes’ convictions without further comment, we find merit in. his claim that the trial court should not have sentenced him as both an habitual felony offender and a prison re-leasee reoffender. In Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000), the supreme court held that the prison releasee reoffender statute precludes imposition of a sentence other than a prison releasee reoffender sentence unless the other sentence is harsher and, thus, that equal concurrent sentences are not permitted. Consequently, we reverse the sentence imposed for the aggravated battery conviction and remand so that Owes can be sentenced as a prison releasee reoffender only. Owes need not be present for the resentencing.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

POLEN, C.J., STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Raymond Owes, the appellant, was convicted of trespass of an occupied structure and aggravated battery, receiving a sentence of eighty-six days incarceration for the trespass charge and fifteen years as both an habitual felony offender and a prison releasee reoffender for the aggravated battery, Owes challenges both his convictions and the aggravated battery sentence. While we affirm Owes’ convictions without further comment, we find merit in. his claim that the trial court should not have sentenced him as both an habitual felony offender and a prison re-leasee reoffender. In Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000), the supreme court held that the prison releasee reoffender statute precludes imposition of a sentence other than a prison releasee reoffender sentence unless the other sentence is harsher and, thus, that equal concurrent sentences are not permitted. Consequently, we reverse the sentence imposed for the aggravated battery conviction and remand so that Owes can be sentenced as a prison releasee reoffender only. Owes need not be present for the resentencing.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

POLEN, C.J., STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

790 So. 2d 1287, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11471, 2001 WL 914018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owes-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack