Owens v. State

398 P.2d 556, 1965 Wyo. LEXIS 120
CourtWyoming Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 26, 1965
DocketNo. 3384
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 398 P.2d 556 (Owens v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Owens v. State, 398 P.2d 556, 1965 Wyo. LEXIS 120 (Wyo. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant in this case, Carl Owens, has applied for post-conviction relief under Ch. 63, S.L. of Wyoming 1961.

The record discloses that Owens was sentenced by the district court in Natrona County, Wyoming, on April 23, 1963, to the Wyoming State Penitentiary for a term of not less than five years nor more than ten years, as a result of a plea of guilty to the charge of breaking and entering.

On August 29, 1963, defendant filed a petition in the same court alleging that his plea of guilty had been obtained by force and duress, and that his punishment was cruel and unusual. The petition having been filed by petitioner without an attorney, the district court appointed counsel for him and proceeded to a full hearing of the application for relief.

This hearing resulted in a dismissal of the petition for relief, with a finding that there had been no denial of the rights of the accused under the Constitution of the United States or the State of Wyoming, and that petitioner was not being illegally restrained of his liberty. Thereupon defendant, through his court-appointed attorney, appealed to the Supreme Court of Wyoming [557]*557and caused a complete record of all proceedings, including a transcript of all testimony, to be furnished for defendant at public expense.

We have carefully reviewed the entire record of proceedings, both with respect to the initial commitment and the post-conviction application. Nothing is disclosed which would support defendant’s allegations of force or duress or cruel and unusual punishment, and we must therefore "hold that the application for post-conviction relief was properly denied.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kallas v. State
776 P.2d 198 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1989)
Hopkinson v. State
632 P.2d 79 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1981)
Beverly Wood Associates v. City of Albuquerque
431 P.2d 67 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
398 P.2d 556, 1965 Wyo. LEXIS 120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owens-v-state-wyo-1965.