Owens v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Owens v. State

1922 OK CR 165, 210 P. 1119, 22 Okla. Crim. 161, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 41

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 28, 1922

DocketNo. A-4028.

StatusPublished

This text of 1922 OK CR 165 (Owens v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Owens v. State, 1922 OK CR 165, 210 P. 1119, 22 Okla. Crim. 161, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 41 (Okla. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Eliza Owens, and George Owens, her husband, were jointly charged with the unlawful possession of 16 gallons of Choctaw beer, a malt and intoxicating liquor, with the unlawful intention of selling the same. Upon her separate trial plaintiff in error, Eliza Owens, was convicted, and her punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for 30 days. No brief has been filed. Numerous errors are assigned in the petition, but from an examination of the record our conclusion is that the errors assigned are destitute of merit. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Eliza Owens, and George Owens, her husband, were jointly charged with the unlawful possession of 16 gallons of Choctaw beer, a malt and intoxicating liquor, with the unlawful intention of selling the same. Upon her separate trial plaintiff in error, Eliza Owens, was convicted, and her punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for 30 days. No brief has been filed. Numerous errors are assigned in the petition, but from an examination of the record our conclusion is that the errors assigned are destitute of merit. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1922 OK CR 165, 210 P. 1119, 22 Okla. Crim. 161, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owens-v-state-oklacrimapp-1922.