Owens v. State
This text of 2016 ND 221 (Owens v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 12/5/16 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2016 ND 221
Billy Owens, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20160214
Appeal from the District Court of Williams County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable David W. Nelson, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Monty G. Mertz, Fargo Public Defender Office, 912 Third Ave. S., Fargo, ND 58103-1707, for petitioner and appellant; on brief.
Nathan K. Madden, Williams County State’s Attorney Office, P.O. Box 2047, Williston, ND 58802; on brief.
Owens v. State
Per Curiam .
[¶1] Billy Owens appeals from a judgment entered after a district court summarily dismissed his application for post-conviction relief. Owens argues the district court erred in concluding his claims regarding the introduction of money transfers were barred by res judicata, it erred in concluding Owens’ ineffective assistance of counsel claims were barred by misuse of process and genuine issues of material facts exist. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Lisa Fair McEvers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2016 ND 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owens-v-state-nd-2016.