Owens v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Owens v. State

512 S.W.3d 105, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 136, 2017 WL 895927

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 7, 2017

DocketED 104111

StatusPublished

This text of 512 S.W.3d 105 (Owens v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Owens v. State, 512 S.W.3d 105, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 136, 2017 WL 895927 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Owens appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2016).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Owens appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2016).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

512 S.W.3d 105, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 136, 2017 WL 895927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owens-v-state-moctapp-2017.