Owens v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Owens v. State

502 S.W.3d 69, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1058, 2016 WL 6210808

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 25, 2016·No. ED 103965·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William Owens (“Movant”) appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William Owens (“Movant”) appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Owens v. State, 502 S.W.3d 69, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1058, 2016 WL 6210808 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

502 S.W.3d 69 (Owens v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.