Owens v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Owens v. State

502 S.W.3d 69, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1058, 2016 WL 6210808

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 25, 2016

DocketED 103965

StatusPublished

This text of 502 S.W.3d 69 (Owens v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Owens v. State, 502 S.W.3d 69, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1058, 2016 WL 6210808 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William Owens (“Movant”) appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William Owens (“Movant”) appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

502 S.W.3d 69, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1058, 2016 WL 6210808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owens-v-state-moctapp-2016.