Owens v. State

125 S.E. 733, 33 Ga. App. 32, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 689

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 12, 1924·No. 15742·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence authorized the verdict finding the defendant guilty of seduction.

The charge of the court Avas full and fair. The two excerpts from the charge of the court complained of in the special grounds of the motion are not erroneous.

Eor no reason pointed out in the record or presented by the argument did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. H. A. Hodges, J. H. Dorsey, for plaintiff in error. J. B. Wall, solicitor-general, Hal Lawson, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The evidence authorized the verdict finding the defendant guilty of seduction.

The charge of the court Avas full and fair. The two excerpts from the charge of the court complained of in the special grounds of the motion are not erroneous.

Eor no reason pointed out in the record or presented by the argument did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. H. A. Hodges, J. H. Dorsey, for plaintiff in error. J. B. Wall, solicitor-general, Hal Lawson, contra.

Owens v. State, 125 S.E. 733, 33 Ga. App. 32, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 689 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

125 S.E. 733 (Owens v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Helton v. State

164 S.E. 686 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)

Opinion

Related