Owens v. State

3 So. 3d 427, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1249, 2009 WL 383600
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Owens v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 948 So. 2d 1009
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 18, 2009·No. 3D08-1044, 3D08-1198·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. McBride, 848 So.2d 287, 291 (Fla.2003) (“Collateral es-toppel ... precludes a defendant from rearguing in a successive rule 3.800 motion the same issue argued in a prior motion.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Owens v. State, 3 So. 3d 427, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1249, 2009 WL 383600 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

3 So. 3d 427 (Owens v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. McBride
848 So. 2d 287 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)