Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Owens v. State

Owens v. State

1 So. 3d 405, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1047, 2009 WL 323331
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 11, 2009·No. 2D07-5565·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

DAVIS, Judge.

Raymond Owens challenges his conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine. We affirm without comment. However, it appears that, after granting Owens’ Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b) motion to correct illegal sentence, the post-conviction court failed to enter an amended cost order and amended conditions of probation. Accordingly, we remand for the limited purpose of the entry of an amended cost order and amended conditions of probation that reflect the correct cost amounts. See Jackson v. State, 950 So .2d 1267 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).

Affirmed; remanded with directions.

LaROSE and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Owens v. State, 1 So. 3d 405, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1047, 2009 WL 323331 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

1 So. 3d 405 (Owens v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson v. State
100 So. 3d 80 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Headrick v. State
72 So. 3d 233 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Hayes v. State
53 So. 3d 1244 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Bassett v. State
23 So. 3d 236 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)