Owens v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Owens v. State

918 So. 2d 449, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 772, 2006 WL 167952

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 25, 2006

DocketNo. 4D05-3628

StatusPublished

This text of 918 So. 2d 449 (Owens v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Owens v. State, 918 So. 2d 449, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 772, 2006 WL 167952 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We treat appellant’s untimely initial brief as a motion for rehearing. We withdraw our decision issued October 19, 2005 and substitute the following in its place.

The denial of appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion seeking additional credit for time served in jail before sentencing is affirmed. Affirmance is without prejudice for appellant to produce or specifically identify record evidence to substantiate the claim that the Broward circuit court entered a “blanket probation” order entitling appellant to additional jail credit in this Indian River County case. If the fact cannot be determined from the record, the motion should be denied. Fountain v. State, 660 So.2d 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). Appellant also has the option of filing in the trial court a timely and legally sufficient Rule 3.850 motion seeking additional jail credit.

FARMER, HAZOURI and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We treat appellant’s untimely initial brief as a motion for rehearing. We withdraw our decision issued October 19, 2005 and substitute the following in its place.

The denial of appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion seeking additional credit for time served in jail before sentencing is affirmed. Affirmance is without prejudice for appellant to produce or specifically identify record evidence to substantiate the claim that the Broward circuit court entered a “blanket probation” order entitling appellant to additional jail credit in this Indian River County case. If the fact cannot be determined from the record, the motion should be denied. Fountain v. State, 660 So.2d 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). Appellant also has the option of filing in the trial court a timely and legally sufficient Rule 3.850 motion seeking additional jail credit.

FARMER, HAZOURI and MAY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

918 So. 2d 449, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 772, 2006 WL 167952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owens-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack