Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Owens v. State

Owens v. State

796 So. 2d 1206, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13730, 2001 WL 1159576
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Owens v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 787 So. 2d 143 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 2, 2001·No. No. 1D01-1253·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary denial of the defendant’s postconviction motion under rule 3.850. The motion was facially insufficient to support a claim that the defendant’s plea was involuntary or a claim that the defendant’s counsel did not adequately investigate the case before advising the defendant to enter the plea. The remaining claims asserted in the motion were properly rejected as a matter of law.

ALLEN, C.J., PADOVANO and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Owens v. State, 796 So. 2d 1206, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13730, 2001 WL 1159576 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

796 So. 2d 1206 (Owens v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.