Owens v. State

453 So. 2d 538, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1688, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13988
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Owens v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 Fla. L. Weekly 302
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 3, 1984·No. Nos. 83-2009, 83-2010·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find error only in the trial court’s retention of jurisdiction over one-half of appellant’s sentences. In accordance with this court’s opinion in Hayes v. State, 448 So.2d 84 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), on motion to modify mandate, 452 So.2d 656 (1984), we remand these cases to the trial court for correction of the sentences to reflect the trial court’s retention of jurisdiction over only one-third of the sentences.

Appellant’s judgments and sentences are otherwise AFFIRMED.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and OTT and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Owens v. State, 453 So. 2d 538, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1688, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13988 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

453 So. 2d 538 (Owens v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hayes v. State
448 So. 2d 84 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Hayes v. State
452 So. 2d 656 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)