Owens v. State
This text of Owens v. State (Owens v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
ANDRE OWENS, § § No. 80, 2018 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § Cr. ID No. 1603002511 (K) STATE OF DELAWARE, § § Plaintiff Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: March 22, 2018 Decided: April 10, 2018
Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VAUGHN, Justices.
ORDER
This 10th day of April 2018, upon consideration of the notice to show cause
and the appellant’s response to the notice to show cause, it appears to the Court that:
(1) On February 16, 2018, the appellant, Andre Owens, filed a notice of
appeal from a February 5, 2018 Superior Court order sentencing him for a violation
of probation. On February 19, 2018, the Senior Court Clerk advised Owens to pay
the Supreme Court filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis no later
than March 6, 2018. Owens was warned that a notice to show cause would issue if
the filing fee was not paid or a motion to proceed in forma pauperis was not filed by
March 6, 2018. (2) Owens did not pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma
pauperis by March 6, 2018. On March 7, 2018, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a
notice directing Owens to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for
his failure to pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis.
(3) In his response to the notice to show cause, Owens describes the delays
in his filing of a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and states that he still would
like to proceed with filing a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Owens did not
include a motion to proceed in forma pauperis with his notice to show cause and still
has not filed one. In light of Owens’ failure to pay the filing fee or file a motion to
proceed in forma pauperis, this appeal must be dismissed.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b),
that this appeal is DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Owens v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owens-v-state-del-2018.