Owens v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: October 8, 2009
• Docket: 09-7209
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7209

CHRISTOPHER DEMONT OWENS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; WARDEN MCCALL; CLAYTOR, Assistant Warden; MAUNCY, Assistant Warden; MAJOR BUSH; LIEUTENANT MONROE; SERGEANT COTTER; LIEUTENANT HAROFF; INVESTIGATOR SHUGART, Investigator; PEARSON, STG Investigator; OFFICER MCBEE; OFFICER DILLARD; JEAN RUTLEDGE; AMY ENLOC, Nurse; ALEWINE, Nurse; COMMISSIONER OZMINT, Director; BOB OLSON, Food Supervisor,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (8:09-cv-00278-GRA-BHH)

Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 8, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Demont Owens, Appellant Pro Se. James Victor McDade, DOYLE, O’ROURKE, TATE & MCDADE, PA, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Christopher Demont Owens appeals the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying his motion for a preliminary injunction. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Owens v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No. 8:09-cv-00278-GRA-

BHH (D.S.C. June 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED