Owens v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

Fourth Circuit

Owens v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

333 F. App'x 712

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 8, 2009·No. No. 09-7209·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Demont Owens appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his motion for a preliminary injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Owens v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No. 8:09-cv-00278-GRA-BHH, 2009 WL 1684501 (D.S.C. June 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the [713] materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Demont Owens appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his motion for a preliminary injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Owens v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No. 8:09-cv-00278-GRA-BHH, 2009 WL 1684501 (D.S.C. June 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the [713] materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Owens v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, 333 F. App'x 712 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

333 F. App'x 712 (Owens v. South Carolina Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.