Owens v. . R. R. Co.
This text of 175 S.E. 926 (Owens v. . R. R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Civil action by owner and driver of automobile to recover damages for personal injury sustained and damage to automobile, alleged to have been caused by the wrongful act, neglect, or default of the defendant. *Page 857
The facts are almost identical with those appearing in the case of Bakerv. R. R.,
Plaintiff testified that when he first saw the reflector on the pier, or center post, he thought it was a bus or truck on the side of the road; that he turned suddenly and then, "upon seeing these oblique lines (indicating on map) I clipped her back, . . . and that threw me off the distance too far. I saw I was going to hit it (center post) one way or another, and I applied my brakes and hit it 20 or 25 miles an hour instead of hitting it 40 or 45 miles an hour."
From a judgment of nonsuit entered at the close of plaintiff's evidence he appeals, assigning error.
That the plaintiff was contributorily negligent appears from his own testimony. Hence, the demurrer to the evidence was properly sustained. S.v. Fulcher,
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
175 S.E. 926, 207 N.C. 856, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owens-v-r-r-co-nc-1934.