Owens v. Owens

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Owens v. Owens

128 So. 3d 974, 2013 WL 6865558, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 20741

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 31, 2013·No. No. 1D12-5648·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Klette v. Klette, 785 So.2d 562, 563 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (“Appellant’s failure to provide either a transcript or proper substitute, such as a stipulated statement of the facts, defeats the appellate court’s ability to review either the factual or legal basis for the trial court’s decision.”); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979).

PADOVANO, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Klette v. Klette, 785 So.2d 562, 563 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (“Appellant’s failure to provide either a transcript or proper substitute, such as a stipulated statement of the facts, defeats the appellate court’s ability to review either the factual or legal basis for the trial court’s decision.”); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979).

PADOVANO, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Owens v. Owens, 128 So. 3d 974, 2013 WL 6865558, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 20741 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

128 So. 3d 974 (Owens v. Owens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related