Owens v. Mayleben
This text of Owens v. Mayleben (Owens v. Mayleben) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
HUBERT OWENS, Derivatively § on Behalf of ESPERION § THERAPEUTICS, INC., § § No. 110, 2020 Plaintiff Below § Appellant, § § v. § Court Below – Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware TIM M. MAYLEBEN, ROGER S. § NEWTON, MARY P. § C.A. No. 12985-VCS MCGOWAN, NICOLE § VITULLO, DOV A. § GOLDSTEIN, DANIEL JANNEY, § ANTONIO M. GOTTO, JR., § MARK E. MCGOVERN, § GILBERT S. OMENN, SCOTT § BRAUNSTEIN, and PATRICK G. § ENRIGHT, § § Individual Defendants Below, § Appellees, § § and § § ESPERION THERAPEUTICS, § INC., § § Nominal Defendant Below § Appellee. §
Submitted: October 14, 2020 Decided: October 29, 2020
Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VAUGHN, and MONTGOMERY- REEVES, Justices. ORDER
On this -- day of October, 2020, after careful consideration of the
parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, and after oral argument, we find it
evident that the final judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed
on the basis of and for the reasons stated in the February 13, 2020
memorandum opinion.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the
Court of Chancery is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Tamika R. Montgomery-Reeves Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Owens v. Mayleben, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owens-v-mayleben-del-2020.