Owens v. Lim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Owens v. Lim

34 A.D.3d 590, 823 N.Y.S.2d 677

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 14, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 34 A.D.3d 590 (Owens v. Lim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Owens v. Lim, 34 A.D.3d 590, 823 N.Y.S.2d 677 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CFLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent Arnold Lim, a Judge of the Family Court, Kings County, to decide a motion for “Modification of Flacement and to Vacate a Jurisdictional Defective Order,” in a proceeding in that court entitled Matter of Jessica K., pending under docket No. NN-20366/04, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

[591]*591Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

This Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction (see CPLR 7804 [b]; 506 [b]) to entertain this proceeding. Crane, J.R, Ritter, Rivera and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CFLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent Arnold Lim, a Judge of the Family Court, Kings County, to decide a motion for “Modification of Flacement and to Vacate a Jurisdictional Defective Order,” in a proceeding in that court entitled Matter of Jessica K., pending under docket No. NN-20366/04, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

[591]*591Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

This Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction (see CPLR 7804 [b]; 506 [b]) to entertain this proceeding. Crane, J.R, Ritter, Rivera and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 A.D.3d 590, 823 N.Y.S.2d 677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owens-v-lim-nyappdiv-2006.